Sunday, October 18, 2009

Don't Just Preach, Practice (Part I: Less Observant Jews)

My Obiter Dicta has begun a critical discussion regarding the importance of introducing Modern Orthodoxy into Israel. I thought I might join the discussion from time to time and add my take on the issue from one specific vantage point - the issue of doing, not just believing. This time round we will discuss the issue of less observant Jews, often referred to as "traditional/masorti" Jews.
Orthodox Jews in Israel have a strange love-hate relationship with masorti Jews, many (though by no means all) of whom come from the Middle East and North Africa. On the one hand, we fought tooth and nail to ensure that many receive minimal religious education in the early years of the state when overwhelming secularism was the rule, both in the classroom and on the street. We count them among our "allies" in the debates regarding the Jewish nature of the country. Yet when it comes to accomodating them on a societal and individual level, we have failed them miserably. Abandonment may sound like a strong word, but it is apt in this situation.
Dr. Matityahu Dagan, a former head of Religious Education for the state, described in his panoramic book how exactly we did that. Put bluntly, Jewish educators in the Masorti-majority schools made little effort to improve the lax religious education given there. In the first generation of the state, Ashkenazim and Masortiyim were geographically seperated, with the result that most Ashkenazim learned with their peers and Masortiyim did likewise. When Masorti Jews started to move into better neighborhoods, the "frumer" and better-off Ashkenazi Jews panicked. The sight of their children learning with kids whose parents didn't keep Mitzvot, and whose children's observance was often lax, triggered the same Pavlovian reaction that led them to protect their children from the hard-core secularist Jews. "Private", "exclusive" and "highly selective" schools - both elementary and secondary became the norm. The latest uproar over education of Ethiopian Jews is simply the latest expression of that fear.
Make no mistake, I believe in the idea of a "khinuch dati". I hold no truck with fantasists who claim that if only we had ensured the same type of education for everyone (a pet peeve of Haaretz and the liberals) then all would be well. There is an unbridgebale chasm between those who believe in God and the Torah and those who do not. To pretend that both can be given the same exact education (necesarily the lowest common denominator) without massive defection to the secular majority betrays a stark naivete about the facts of life. This is not to say that we do not have common ground, or that we cannot fruitfully coexist. It is just that certain differences can not be bridged.
But the idea that living and learning alongisde Masorti Jews is the same thing religiously as doing so among open atheists and secularists is to me a horrible Hillul Hashem. It is also a declaration that we are just as pathetically spiritually weak as the Haredim, many of whom make every effort to avoid people who are not "Me-anshei shelomeinu". Apparently, for all our alleged openness, we are just a bunch of cowards. Anyone who doesn't cover their hair or dress tzniut enough, plays soccer on Shabbat or doesn't make it to shul except on holidays is the equivalent of an apikores lehach'is. Our children, even when they're teenagers or in the army, are so pathetically weak spiritually that the first contact with anyone not like them will make them drop the kipa like a piano. If that's the case, what the hell was the point of all that Torah study?!
So what does all this have to do with doing? It's simple. Stop blabbing about "Achdut Yisra'el" and put your money where your mouth is. Live in places that have a wide scale religiously, especially in the North and the South. Stop hiding in a bubble. Invite Jews over to your house for Shabbat even if it means they might drive (leave the option for not being mehalel Shabbat open). Let your kids play with them. Let them come to your Shul even if they don't show up with a kipa or in jeans. Accept them with open arms and help them rather than scorn them if they falter. Wish them a Shabbat Shalom when you pass them by. Channel Rav Aryeh Levin rather than the Brisker Rav.
I can hear the objections coming out already. My children will stop being religious. I'll be mesaye'a yedei ovrei aveirah. Neither argument works with me. Your children are at risk of stopping to be religious the minute they are born into a world dominated by kefira, both of the low (te'avon) and high (philosophy) variety. It is your job as a parent to work on his/her spiritual well-being and not "take the easy way out" by trying to shunt him into a glorified incubator. At least that's what you should do if you genuinely consider yourself non-Haredi. As for mesaye'ah yedei ovrei aveirah, I have two responses to that: 1) "Chalel alav Shabbat echad cedei sheyekayem Shabatot harbeh" - you never know whether your actions will encourage people to come closer to Judaism or at least ensure their children receive a religious education 2) Kidush Hashem - Even if that doesn't pan out, just causing people to say "zo Torah vezo sechara" or some variation thereof with delight is reward enough.
There is no need to give sins a liberal-religious rubber stamp. All we need to do is keep the door open, standing in front with a tray of cookies, a siddur and a smile on our faces.
UPDATE: Dov makes an important point, one I wish to discuss. Obviously issues of serious halakhic import such as Jews driving on Shabbat can not be solved simply with the conceptual statements I quoted above. My point was more to give an ideological underpinning to halakhic kulas that might allow for inviting Jews like that under certain circumstances. It was not, h"v, to replace halakha but to reinforce a certain way of halakhic thinking against the "always be makhmir" types.
OTOH, no offense, Dov, but I think "solid Torah learning" is a cop-out. Who makes the call when it comes to "solid Torah learning"? The Charedi-exclusivist camp that calls the Rav "JB" and spits on and insults every Rav, no matter how great, who dared to be pasken lekula, especially in our community (just look at the assault on Shabbat elevators, which were allowed based on solid Torah learning but unacceptable to the machmir croud)? Just what would constitute acceptable "solid Torah learning"?!
I think this kind of thinking is exactly what paralyzes us - the fear of "ma yomru". "Solid Torah learning" should be halakha and hashkafa solidly grounded in the sources, but not afraid to openly and unapologetically go in other directions if the situation calls for it. We need independent poskim (poskim, not "wooly-headed left ideologues", as you so quaintly put it), even mavericks, who can help us wade through the difficult territory that is MO.
UPDATE II: Quite a number of comments have come up on the education integration issue. While I agree that it is a serious challenge, doing nothing but kvetching about the situation doesn't help. If anyone who reads this post has better ways of reaching out to Am Yisra'el MO style than what I suggested, then by all means, share with us.
Remember, it is better to light a candle than curse the darkness.

18 comments:

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

QED: I dont think the majority of modern dati le'umi Israelies have a problem with being friendly with masorti Jews and inviting them over for shabbat.

I live in a mixed secular/religious community, and we're not totally insulated. What bothered me more were the hardcore secular Jews who refused to send them kids to the trom-trom-trom chova mamlachti dati gan, and forced the opening a Torah-free gan, where zero brachot are said over food, zero knowledge of the chagim and basic Judasim are taught, and G-d forbid there should be a "kaballat shabbat" program.

We have community tefillot for Yom Kippur -- and overall, the average dati person views everyone as part of the community.

While we're one example - Tekoa is an even better one.

aiwac said...

I'm glad to hear it, and I know there are many in the DL community like that. Unfortunately, the trend toward self-segregation is still very prevalent: witness the "va'adot kabala" of yishuvim kehilatiyim, the stringent standards of many an educational institution, and the constant advertising for "dati-leumi" only housing.

I hope and pray your type of DL will prevail; am yisra'el needs it.

Dov said...

As a recent oleh hadash who left my haredi background for a dati leumi one, I agree with the thrust of your arguments. Indeed, I live in a predominantly secular part of Rehovot, and try to maximize positive interactions with my secular neighbours. However, I am troubled by the flippancy with which you treat the halakhic issue of inviting guests who will drive on Shabbat. This is a straight halakhic question which requires a posek's expertise, not the quotation of Talmudic maxims which may not be relevant to the question at hand. Using the "kiddush Hashem" involved in inviting Shabbat descrators as an argument for its permissibility is the sort of woolly, non-halakhic thinking that is pushing me more towards the torani, exclusivist camp, despite my misgivings about its attitude to secular studies and the like. Similarly, "chalel shabbat achat..." is only used utilized in halakha in very specific circumstances, and is not a justification for the wholesale negation of the prohibition of m'sayeah lidei ovrei aveirah. My intention is not to enter into a pilpul. Indeed, I am fully aware that there are poskim who are lenient on this issue. My concern is that the creation of a new Modern Orthodoxy in Israel will fail unless built on a base of solid Torah learning, rather than ends-justifying-the-means thinking, which seems to me to characterise much of the discourse I read coming from the left of the Orthodox world.

aiwac said...

I'm sorry if you thought I was being flippant; that was certainly not my intention (maybe to be blunt...). Obviously we need poskim to hammer out the details of when and how one can invite Jews over for Shabbat even if they MIGHT drive.

While I am not on the left, and frankly I find many of their ideas to be foreign to Yahadut, there does need to be an ideological underpinning to halakhic kulas (something I will discuss in another post).

BTW, "Solid Torah learning" is in the eye of the beholder. Halakhic rulings by MO (non-Haredi, Hardal) Rabbis that are mekel, now matter how well-grounded, will never be respected by their Charedi counterparts - not now, not ever.

So contrary to what you argue, I believe that we need a halakha mekela + meta-halakha for MO. I will update my post accordingly. But thank you for your comments.

Y. Ben-David said...

Very nice sentiments......but, particularly in the educational realm, not so easy to implement. I will give an example that ties in with the recent crisis in Petah Tikva about the private or semi-private dati schools not wanting to take in Ethiopian children....
Some 10 years ago we enrolled our son in a Noam school. At the initial parents meeting we asked if there would be Ethiopian children in the class. The principal said that everyone had to pitch in to accomate that community and so the school would accept some but the principal said that he made certain that their families were shomer mitzvot and that the was a father living at home (i.e. no single mother kids). Very nice. It turns out that the 3 Ethiopian kids in my son's class, during the entire 6 years of that class's presence in the school, were the BIGGEST source of disruption in the class. The class, and my son, really suffered from it. A very fine teacher (an American oleh) was fired because he simply was not up to riding herd on those kids. Finally, for the last two years they brought in a big, tough product of hesder and the IDF who finally managed to partially restore order. One day my wife dropped by the class and saw one of them stuffing another kid into a garbage can!

I live across the street from a Mamlachti Dati school that is required to take all Ethiopians who want to study there and I see them coming everyday, most of the kids WITHOUT kippot. They have to be kept in separate classes.

So it is very nice to sit around and write nice blogs about "ahdut Israel" and tolerance and the such, but there is a price to be paid for it. Everyone has to decide this for himself and it doesn't necessarily mean he is a racist or religious fanatic if they want a better environment for their kids.

aiwac said...

Y.,

Just because it's "not so easy to implement" doesn't excuse not trying. It's the same "never take risks" attitude that created the whole Chardal and chumra phenomenon in the first place.

As for what you're talking about, I think we need to seperate two issues.

Enforcement of discipline has nothing to do with what I was talking about. If the students were really as violent as you said, then the failure is the school's for not meting out proper punishment, not the idea of integration itself.

Your second point I simply cannot accept. Just because they don't wear kippot to school does not, in my opinion, justify segregation. Your kids likely see stuff like this everyday on the street as well; I see no reason why their existence in school will be so spiritually unsettling.

As for not being "racist or fanatical" - I never said any such thing. I simply consider such an attitude of "Ani (Umishpachti) veafsi od" and "ani et mishpachti hetzalti" to often have powerful elements of selfishness and cowardice. I'm sure you yourself are not like that, but there are many who are, and this post is partially meant as tochacha to such people.

I genuinely believe that we can not afford to let tens, if not hundreds of thousands of Jews lose all real contact with religion simply to make our lives and our kids' lives a little easier.

Seth (Avi) Kadish · אבי קדיש said...

Hi. I have written several essays, each of which describes years of my own efforts, and those of a close friend, to do exactly what you describe in this blog. It has been extremely hard, but the hardest part of all has been the apathy (and even the antagonism) of Religious Zionism to our efforts.

The material can be found here:
http://skadish1.googlepages.com/open-torah

While I agree with everything you wrote about the masorti'im, and while my own life is deep within the reality that you describe, I would add that to my mind there is another major population that is no less of a test case for Religious Zionism, and which is systematically ignored in our urban communities. That population is Russian-speaking immigrants along with their spouses, children and extended families. To my mind, this is the population that is most open to Modern Orthodox community life, if only we would pay more attention to it. So far we haven't.

aiwac said...

Seth,

I fully agree with you regarding the Russian commmunity, but as they have their own specific attributes and there are different halakhic dillemas regarding them, I prefer to deal with them in a seperate post.

I'm not so sure I would go as far as you do with the Kehilah Petuchah idea, but I belive our differences are ones of tactics and degree, not general strategy.

Aleh Vehatzlach, aiwac.

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

Aiwac; What do you do when 50% of a high school class is chozer bishe'ayla -- and is led (or influenced) by less religious kids?

My older kids who attend a reputable Yeshiva High School are definitely influenced by the chevra there.

I think High School is much more of an integration problem then jr high and elementary school.

aiwac said...

Jameel,

You raise very important points. Let me reiterate:

Integration is not without its very serious risks. It is the much more difficult path. As My Obiter Dicta says, it's a humra not a kula.

I don't pretend to have all the answers, just some of them and a lot of questions. I can suggest some directions, though:

1) Consultation with educators in the field to work on strategies. There are many experienced teachers
and administrators who have dealt with this. We should collect as much information as we can about the various strategies to insure religious strengh.

2) Parents and educators should keep an open channel of commnication with their children - no question is tabboo. They should know that they have people to talk to even if they falter repeatedly due to peer pressure or otherwise.

Obviously this is not enough for such a serious problem, and I more than welcome suggestions from the commenters.

The point of my post was to provoke discussion, and it has clearly succeeded. No-one has all the answers; let's share ideas.

David Tzohar said...

1- I really must protest your your chutzpadik comment on preffering the way of Rav Aryeh Levin over that of the Brisker Rav. You do both Gedolim a great disservice.
2-As a former Rav Bet-sefer at a mamlachti dati primary school and presently a teacher at a yeshiva tichonit,I found most of what you wrote to be simplistic and naive. My experience has been that when there is a large percentage of "masortiim" (although there is a question of defining 'who is a masorti' the end result is that the Torah education of the institution levels out at the lowest common denominator. At the school where I teach many of the "better" kids leave after the ninth grade to go to more 'torani' yeshivot making the situation even worse. The balance between outreach and quality Torah education is a fine one and needs to be addressed in a serious and responsible manner. As you yourself wrote, there are no easy answers.
-David Tzohar

aiwac said...

1) Regarding the Brisker Rav, I stand by my position that his way is not our way, and never will be. He was undoubtably an incredible Gadol Batorah, but his virulent, seperatist and negationist methods are ones we can not, must not emulate. It is easier to catch flies with honey rather than vinegar.

2) You yourself have just answered your own question - the fact that the demographic balance is so badly tilted in favor of masortiyim (including "better" students leaving) is what leads to "lowest common denominator" style teaching. Maybe if we worked on creating a critical mass of "better students" and dedicated teachers in schools, then things would be better. At least it's worth a shot.

I am in no way "naive" about the difficulties. I have studied the history of religious education in this country rather extensively and I know just how prevalent "horadat kipa" was and is. But complete isolation is not the answer. Even the Charedim are buckling under the strain of this one-track policy, if the Emes Ve-Emuna blog is to believed.

Rather than just complain and criticize, perhaps you can make some positive suggestions?

David Tzohar said...

I agree that total isolation is not the answer,but neither is total, unchecked integration.Here are some positive suggestions.
1-Improving the system of "tichonim dattiim"by attracting more staff from Yeshiva graduates and changing the curriculum so that while it is not identical to that of yeshivot tichoniot it provides a good basic religeous education.
2- Better teacher training for bogrei yeshivot.
3- More parent and community involvement esp. among mesortiim.
4-Changing the matriculation system for religeous studies which is the main reason for the deplorable state of Gemara studies.
5- Creating a more havayati(experiential?)educational atmosphere.

Seth (Avi) Kadish · אבי קדיש said...

Thanks. In terms of "different halakhic dillemas regarding" Russian-speaking immigrants and their families, you obviously mean giyyur. That is a hot topic and an important one, but it is not what I am talking about. (When it comes to giyyur, I actually think religious Zionism has come a long way and done wonderful things, despite all the problems. Sometimes we deserve credit too.) Rather, I am talking about religious communities opening themselves up to the majority, who are halakhically Jewish and proud to be Jews.

Here is an strong example of the problem: A group of former refuseniks and Prisoners of Zion settled in Maalei Adumim with their families. Torah observant Jews and highly educated people who lived lives of incredible mesirut nefesh le-shem shamayim. But when they went to enroll their children in a local "Torani" school, they were initially rejected because of "social gaps". No joke. A solution was eventually found, but if this is how world-class heroes are treated, then how has the rest of the immigration fared with Religious Zionism?

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

This reminds me of a group of Ethiopians looking to go to a settlement in the 90s.

The misrad haklita approached Efrat, Ofra and Kedumim.

IIRC: Efrat threatened to go to Bagatz to prevent them from entering their community, Kedumim was pareve (but did start a whole program in the Ulpana for them) and Ofra accepted them with open arms.

Tekoa is also an excellent example of an accepting community. On the other hand -- my community has an open policy, and we've ended up with a ton of wackos. (obviously, myself included).

The local joke is we're a haven for the FBI witness protection & relocation program.

aiwac said...

Jameel,

I am sickened and horrified that people (not everyone) in Efrat would do such a thing. Shame on them.

BTW, I happen to like wackos :).

Seth,

Actually I was not referring to giyur at all, but rather what you speak of: that segment of the Russian community that is undeniably halakhically Jewish.

However, as I said, the challenges and methods are different from Mizrahi and Ashkenazi masortiyim, for reasons I will elucidate in an upcoming post (after I've spent some time learning the subject properly).

These include: next to no Jewish knowledge in many cases (through no fault of their own) - formal, memetic, social or otherwise. Langauge and cultural barriers which are much thicker than second and third generation veterans here, and so on.

Obviously this is painting with a broad brush, and I hope to discuss it more in depth later.

aiwac

Not Brisk said...

"Channel Rav Aryeh Levin rather than the Brisker Rav."

Learn your history. Brisk was mostly secular, but the congregation had a warm relationship, on a personal level, with their Rov. The secular element even aided his escape and tried to get the rest of his family to a safe haven

aiwac said...

NotBrisk,

Thanks for the information...but I was referring to his time here in Eretz Yisra'el.

All the Best

aiwac